From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 30 08:17:16 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63490106564A; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:17:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5590915405A; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E5C9C8A.1010105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:17:14 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110824 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: <4E5C79AF.6000408@FreeBSD.org> <20110830062541.GA5538@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20110830062541.GA5538@lonesome.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: secteam@FreeBSD.org, "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Why do we not mark vulnerable ports DEPRECATED? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:17:16 -0000 On 08/29/2011 23:25, Mark Linimon wrote: > So, the right answer may be "it depends". I think my point is, it shouldn't. If a port is important/popular than it will be quickly fixed. If not, it goes away. Everyone wins. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/