From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 12 22:51:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA32316A46C for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@bitfreak.org) Received: from mail.twinthornes.com (mail.twinthornes.com [65.75.198.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB02F13C45A for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:51:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@bitfreak.org) Received: from [10.9.70.107] (pool-71-117-207-47.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.207.47]) by mail.twinthornes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9008411E; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <466F1CCF.6020607@bitfreak.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:23:11 -0700 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, jroberson@chesapeake.net References: <200706051316.l55DGSU0052272@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200706051316.l55DGSU0052272@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Intel C2D COREs not used equally in FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 22:51:44 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > In practice there's (almost) only one reason not to run > FreeBSD/amd64 on amd64-capable hardware: If you depend > on a certain piece of software which is known not to run > correctly in 64bit mode. Fortunately those are not many. Is there a list of known amd64-broken ports or have they all been flagged in the tree with (NOT|ONLY)_FOR_ARCHS variables?