From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 14:23:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D375F3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D6E8F4 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=L+6fspv8 c=1 sm=0 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:17 a=d8Isu0L9vBEA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=T68KuOtnIhgeSEkPQFoA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=AdtlHf8BKSVdY42ICL0A:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=QJ6YB865eIjTZC6m:21 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 173.63.211.146 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [173.63.211.146] ([173.63.211.146:47870] helo=[192.168.1.8]) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id C6/A9-09236-AEA83215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:23:38 -0500 Message-ID: <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:23:37 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130209 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "office@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:23:40 -0000 18.02.2013 15:26, Chris Rees ???????(??): > I'm sure you understand that our compiler in base is rather elderly, > and that a project as insanely huge as Libreoffice is going to be > highly sensitive to minute changes. No, Chris... I do not understand this wonderfully PR-esque response. See, my understanding always was, the only possible reasons for a compiler to produce a non-starting executable are: 1. The code is buggy. 2. The compiler is buggy. 3. Both of the above. My question was, which is it? 19.02.2013 00:35, Kevin Oberman ???????(??): > Just for the record, is find that it works fine for me with gcc-4.6. > 9.1-STABLE on i386 system. Building it with the default compiler > results in a successful build, but the program would simply exit after > a few seconds with no error. The exist status was 0. No messages. When > I built with 4.6, it builds and runs fine Yes, 4.6 is supposed to work and is supported by the office@ team. My question was about 4.2.1, which happens to be the base cc/c++ in 8.x and in 9.x as well, if world was built WITHOUT_CLANG. I too observe the 4.2.1-compiled office die at start-up -- the splash screen starts nicely and exits after kicking off the actual soffice.bin which segfaults. -mi