From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun 20 17:20:10 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D55530;
 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:20:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (khavrinen.csail.mit.edu
 [IPv6:2001:470:8b2d:1e1c:21b:21ff:feb8:d7b0])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "khavrinen.csail.mit.edu", Issuer "Client CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46EE726D4;
 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:20:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s5KHK7kE071629
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256
 verify=FAIL CN=khavrinen.csail.mit.edu issuer=Client+20CA);
 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:20:07 -0400 (EDT)
 (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu)
Received: (from wollman@localhost)
 by khavrinen.csail.mit.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s5KHK6GM071626;
 Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:20:06 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <21412.27974.858589.84131@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:20:06 -0400
From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@csail.mit.edu>
To: Kevin Lo <kevlo@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Is AF_UNIX really deprecated?
In-Reply-To: <20140620025318.GA39576@ns.kevlo.org>
References: <20140619054743.GA33893@ns.kevlo.org>
 <21411.3294.418186.992207@khavrinen.csail.mit.edu>
 <20140620025318.GA39576@ns.kevlo.org>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (khavrinen.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:20:08 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-standards>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 17:20:10 -0000

<<On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:53:18 +0800, Kevin Lo <kevlo@FreeBSD.org> said:

> It seems that the word "deprecated" may lead to misunderstanding.
> The diff below removes "deprecated" to socket(2).  Does it look ok?  Thanks.

I don't think that's quite what we want.  Let me see if I can whip up
a diff.

-GAWollman