From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Jan 4 11:05:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA15644 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 11:05:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA15633 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 11:04:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 0xov8i-0004g7-00; Sun, 4 Jan 1998 10:51:12 -0800 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 1998 10:50:31 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: Darren Reed cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP-able chips? In-Reply-To: <199801040916.BAA13166@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Darren Reed wrote: > > I can't answer the second question, but as to the first, all motherboards > > available today use the Intel Apic design, not the OpenApic design that > > the cpus other than Intel implement. The meaning to that is, if it's not > > an Intel CPU, you're not going to run SMP with it. > > Does this include th ASUS motherboard which takes the CPU daughterboards ? Definitely. Perhaps ASUS could make a daughtercard with OpenAPIC design (or is the APIC on the motherboard not the daughtercard?). > Darren Tom