From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 06:59:49 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8FFF106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:59:49 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B26C8FC0A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:59:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5K6xmrc071591;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:59:48 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5K6xmBB071588; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:59:48 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:59:48 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+tpaK0XUEBpT7SiwsY=+wEPgOd=TAh=Eh7fwim1Odq1jUqZag@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200854450.71564@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191952250.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<854D02B1-CA89-4F5E-8773-DB05F2868D74@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200618290.46371@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+tpaK2ONz2wD7Zb4Hi9W6kk7RR8_VZR8YJTj9jAEj_b4_sDaQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206200716330.71176@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<CA+tpaK0XUEBpT7SiwsY=+wEPgOd=TAh=Eh7fwim1Odq1jUqZag@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Wed, 20 Jun 2012 08:59:49 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Michel Talon <talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CLANG vs GCC tests of fortran/f2c program
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:59:50 -0000

> long term goals.  Eliminating, or at least not being dependent on a GNU
> toolchain.  GPL v3 brings with it a whole host problems such as:

As you already know i don't like GPL very much. As i already said for me 
GNU is computer communism.

But like or not like, i don't prefer my likeness above facts and FreeBSD
performance. And the facts are against clang.

BUT PLEASE stop offtopic explaining about secure boot problems  and answer 
one clear question:

What exactly GPLv3 have wrong that we can use gcc in longer term for 
FreeBSD system?

OK? Can you just answer that simple question clearly?