Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:38:17 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-fortran@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why fortran mailing list? Message-ID: <20130710133817.GB41178@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <201307100908.r6A98jOM001342@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20130710084713.GA73590@graf.pompo.net> <201307100908.r6A98jOM001342@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le mer 10 jul 13 à 11:08:45 +0200, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk> écrivait : > Regarding this patch, is it ok to just put it > unde files, as: > > # ls files/ > medis-patch-Lib_Makefile.txt patch-Lib::proto.h patch-Test::Makefile > patch-CONFIG::configure patch-Lib_Makefile patch-onmetis > patch-CONFIG_onmetis.in patch-Programs::Makefile > # > > How does the ports framework know that > medis-patch-Lib_Makefile.txt must be applied > *after* patch-Lib_Makefile, i.e. on top of it? Actually, it has to be renamed as patch-*. And patches are applied sorted by their name. > P.S. Please ignore my reply to ports/176328. > I understand now what to do. Great! -- Th. Thomas.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130710133817.GB41178>