From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Fri Dec 25 17:36:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96154A50EE1 for ; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58888183F; Fri, 25 Dec 2015 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-234-233.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.234.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id tBPHakG7001924 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Dec 2015 09:36:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: layer2 ipfw fwd To: Mark Felder , bycn82 References: <567795F1.5080605@freebsd.org> <56780F5A.5060209@freebsd.org> <1450885787.1918354.474995842.261BD65D@webmail.messagingengine.com> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Ganbold Tsagaankhuu From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <567D7EA9.6050201@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 01:36:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1450885787.1918354.474995842.261BD65D@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 17:36:52 -0000 On 23/12/2015 11:49 PM, Mark Felder wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015, at 08:40, Julian Elischer wrote: >> This is EXACTLY what the cisco/ironport web filter appliance does... >> > If we had this in FreeBSD nobody would have to reinvent the wheel to > build a similar appliance, right? And it might allow someone to build a > competing open source FreeBSD-based web filter appliance with this same > feature set... nah...there is SO MUCH MORE to what the ironport does. > >