Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 3 Jan 2021 19:57:12 +0100
From:      =?utf-8?Q?Klaus_K=C3=BCchemann?= <maciphone2@googlemail.com>
To:        Andy McClements <ajm@ip-ether.net>, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>, Robert Crowston <crowston@protonmail.com>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com>
Subject:   Re: RPi4b 8GB 13.0-Current, XHCI broken, wrong U-Boot ?
Message-ID:  <219ADB09-3A60-4EE6-8ACD-0AC3130D1F64@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <eb72b668-7a02-c873-5af8-b292b5eb12a5@ip-ether.net>
References:  <007c8658-b7b6-6852-536c-9c36af64506b@ip-ether.net> <D22EDD0F-8A8E-466C-BCEC-C8E2B3EA9A6B@googlemail.com> <aaefd44f-9dfd-be08-b446-d85c1df185a9@ip-ether.net> <5B626DCC-6F7C-4554-803C-F488A1ED9BEB@googlemail.com> <56d10ea4-3284-3e4c-9521-8bf1008caa2b@ip-ether.net> <26D146B8-0362-4008-9A1F-A6CD6B1479BB@googlemail.com> <6610c9a3-1e61-b7e5-c537-3080dd7ee8ae@ip-ether.net> <eb72b668-7a02-c873-5af8-b292b5eb12a5@ip-ether.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Andy,

thanks for your further testing!

> Am 03.01.2021 um 19:29 schrieb Andy McClements <ajm@ip-ether.net>:
>=20
> =E2=80=A6...
>=20
> So it seems to me that patch D26853 **is not required**, if the =
upstream file is now working OK.

-),yes, possible, that was my last comment on =
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D26853#623408  ,
that perhaps the reset-patch made it upstream.

> Am 03.01.2021 um 19:29 schrieb Andy McClements <ajm@ip-ether.net>:
>=20
> HOWEVER, the 20201227 firmware release appears to introduce some other =
problem, as already reported if ALL the files on the DOS partition are =
replaced with those from 20201227, it results in a crash in U-boot.

=E2=80=A6 yes, that=E2=80=99s why I uploaded different start4.elf, =
fixup4.dat etc. yesterday for testing =E2=80=A6

So the question here seems to be:
WHO is here the upstream( gnu,rpi-org,jesus christ, who knows) ,WHAT is =
going on with that upstream and at least:
what the heck has to sit in our msdospartion- DOWNstream :-) Ha Ha=20

The simplest were to replace one file instead of more, I guess it should =
simply work , nothing else. In best case with files which are controlled =
by ourselves, not by uncontrollable` upstream, whoever that is=E2=80=A6 =
we can choose to load an upstreamed file which perhaps works today=20
and breaks tomorrow. Or we can choose to compile dts ourselves, which is =
then under control=E2=80=A6
Just my humble opinion, while that doesn`t count =E2=80=A6 only thing =
counts is that it should work, by what way ever.=20

Regards

K.=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?219ADB09-3A60-4EE6-8ACD-0AC3130D1F64>