From owner-cvs-all Tue Oct 3 16:33: 4 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from netplex.com.au (adsl-63-207-30-186.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.207.30.186]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A774237B66D; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netplex.com.au (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netplex.com.au (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e93NWwH17285; Tue, 3 Oct 2000 16:32:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <200010032332.e93NWwH17285@netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: Warner Losh , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/finger finger.c In-Reply-To: <20001003123347.C3076@dragon.nuxi.com> Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 16:32:58 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "David O'Brien" wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2000 at 10:58:30AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > > We used to be really good about this and as we've grown the cautious > > merge into -stable ethic has become diluted. It is time to tighten > > things down for a while again. The finger thing has shown that the > > current practices are too loose. > > And the only way to return to this is to put peer presure on committers > who MFC too quick. I know I am guilty of this sometimes, but yes. More care and patience is IMHO the best solution. Things that have potential remote access exposure could probably have stronger requirements. (again IMHO). Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message