From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Jun 22 4:28:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from luxren2.boostworks.com (luxren2.boostworks.com [194.167.81.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3E837C285 for ; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 04:28:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@boostworks.com) Received: from boostworks.com (root@oldrn.luxdev.boostworks.com [192.168.1.99]) by luxren2.boostworks.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA94031; Thu, 22 Jun 2000 13:27:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200006221127.NAA94031@luxren2.boostworks.com> Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2000 13:27:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Remy Nonnenmacher Reply-To: remy@boostworks.com Subject: Re: staroffice 5.2 To: coredumped@coredumped.null.ru Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3951A97B.D3725F0E@coredumped.null.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 22 Jun, Eugeny Kuzakov wrote: > hi*& > > Has anyone succesfully installed subj? > Yes. But beware that the SO setup program is very restrictive about display depth and do not work if it can't acquire enought colors. For me, it fails on 8 bits and on 8+24 bits but works well on 24 bits. (not tried with 15 or 16 bits). If the setup doesn't start, it dies silently and the port install fails, looking like it *is* a port problem instead of the Staroffice setup program one. (BTW, I found SO far more stable under FBSD linux emulation than under a real linux). RN. ItM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message