Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 Jul 2002 16:27:58 -0400 (EDT)
From:      John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org>, "Brian J. McGovern" <bmcgover@cisco.com>, re@FreeBSD.org, qa@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Update for 4.6.1 issues
Message-ID:  <XFMail.20020725162758.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020725191018.GB62517@sunbay.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 25-Jul-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 10:06:37PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 02:52:48PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> > 
>> > On 25-Jul-2002 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 11:27:30AM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
>> > >> If memory serves me right, "Brian J. McGovern" wrote:
>> > >> > Is the examples issue a problem with CVS not checking them out? Or is it an
>> > >> > issue of the release process not doing the right thing? I can't do the first
>> > >> > (no commit privs), but I can look at the second over this coming weekend if
>> > >> > we think its a release process issue.
>> > >> 
>> > >> It's a release process problem, I think.  I thought that Ruslan (CC-ed)
>> > >> committed a fix for this problem to HEAD, but I don't know what the MFC
>> > >> status is.  Maybe he can shed a little light on this?
>> > >> 
>> > > This was fixed in:
>> > > 
>> > > bsd.subdir.mk,v 1.44          (5.0-CURRENT)
>> > > bsd.subdir.mk,v 1.30.2.2      (4.6-STABLE)
>> > > 
>> > > A work-around for RELENG_4_6 (if it's wanted) is to replace the bsd.subdir.mk
>> > > by bsd.prog.mk in share/examples/Makefile:
>> > 
>> > How big is the real fix?  I personally wouldn't mind the workaround, but if
>> > the fix isn't too big I'd rather just do it right to begin with.
>> > 
>> Quite big and not worth the effort IMHO, as it's not security-related.
>> Let's don't pollute the security branches with the non-security stuff.
>> 
> Better commit the kludge to RELENG_4_*'s bsd.lib.mk so that ports
> affected could still be built on these branches.  (This fixes the
> bug where the missing LIB= would result in bsd.lib.mk attempting
> to build/install lib.a and lib_p.a.)

Is this in RELENG_4 as well?  Did we have this bug in 4.6-REL?

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>  <><  http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020725162758.jhb>