From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 12 06:42:56 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD97016A419;
	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:42:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7F113C459;
	Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:42:56 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 2BC048C134; Thu,  7 Feb 2008 00:33:11 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 00:33:11 -0600
To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20080207063311.GA6118@soaustin.net>
References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: Yar Tikhiy <yar@freebsd.org>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>,
	Jeff Roberson <jeff@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org,
	Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:42:56 -0000

On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 02:00:41AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> - Do you know a good reason to not use FUSE ntfs implementation?

We just had a PR come in that claims the ports FUSE NTFS implementation
isn't working:

  120286 alepulve ports    open      serious   medium   current-us
  sysutils/fusefs-ntfs makes fatal trap/page fault in FreeBSD-7.0

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120286&cat=

mcl