From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 17:47:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F7416A4DE for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (eva.fit.vutbr.cz [147.229.10.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AFA43D60 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:47:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz) Received: from eva.fit.vutbr.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (envelope-from xdivac02@eva.fit.vutbr.cz) (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7NHlfWf083431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:47:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from xdivac02@localhost) by eva.fit.vutbr.cz (8.13.7/8.13.3/Submit) id k7NHlfnn083430; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:47:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:47:41 +0200 From: Divacky Roman To: Paul Mather Message-ID: <20060823174741.GA83282@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <1156096970.19717.12.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <20060820204338.GA76869@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <1156121912.32130.22.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> <20060821080748.GA14037@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20060821134635.GA27362@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <1156348193.1499.11.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1156348193.1499.11.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 147.229.10.14 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linuxulator: syscall statfs64 not implemented? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:47:51 -0000 On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:49:53AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 15:46 +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > > > it seems like very trivial so expect patch today ;) > > > > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/statfs64.patch > > > > pls tell me if this works, thnx > > The patch applied and built on i386. However, when I run the resultant > kernel, the problem of the "syscall statfs64 not implemented" messages > goes away but my Tivoli backup still fails (in a different way). (The > same Tivoli client and setup worked on i386 -CURRENT prior to > mid-August, and currently is working on an i386 6.1-STABLE system.) > > Now, when the scheduled backup runs, I get things like this in my > dsmerror.log: > > 08/23/06 02:58:37 TransErrno: Unexpected error from GetFSInfo:statfs, errno = 14 > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1228E Sending of object '/backup' failed > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1063E The specified path is not a valid file system or logical volume name. > > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1228E Sending of object '/backup/var' failed > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1063E The specified path is not a valid file system or logical volume name. > > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1228E Sending of object '/backup/usr' failed > 08/23/06 02:58:38 ANS1063E The specified path is not a valid file system or logical volume name. > > 08/23/06 02:58:40 ANS1512E Scheduled event 'DESKTOP_DAILY_BACKUP' failed. Return code = 12. > > > I don't know if this indicates that there is a problem with the > implementation of statfs64/statfs, now. (I don't know if it complicates > matters, but I'm backing up mounted snapshots.) pls, can you build -DDEBUG version of linuxolator and show me what it prints?