From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Sep 4 10:40:11 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971A537B407 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f84He8P00625; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:40:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:40:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200109041740.f84He8P00625@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" Subject: Re: ports/30285: Update to net/ytalk Reply-To: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/30285; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira" To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/30285: Update to net/ytalk Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:35:18 +0000 Could you please investigate why the distfile changed without a version bump? It has been pointed to my attention that this is a very important piece of information, specially to avoid trojan horses. And, I agree that this is A Good Thing(TM). Also, developers are usually happy to bump version numbers if good reasons are presented. -- Mario S F Ferreira - UnB - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." lioux at ( freebsd dot org | linf dot unb dot br ) flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message