From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 6 16:11:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF625106564A for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhein@symmetricom.com) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DE808FC0A for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 16:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gromit.timing.com (gromit.timing.com [206.168.13.209]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q56GB7lq073968; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:11:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jhein@symmetricom.com) Received: from gromit.timing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gromit.timing.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q56GAYOV088062; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:10:34 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jhein@gromit.timing.com) Received: (from jhein@localhost) by gromit.timing.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q56GASr1088061; Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:10:28 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jhein) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20431.33012.144653.728657@gromit.timing.com> Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 10:10:28 -0600 From: John Hein To: Mark Felder In-Reply-To: References: <20120606131623.GA82148@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20431.28886.146662.868144@gromit.timing.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b-8.2.x-reddyuday.r1325 under 24.0.93.1 (i386-portbld-freebsd7.4) Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposition to make nvidia driver stop overwritting files X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2012 16:11:46 -0000 Mark Felder wrote at 10:12 -0500 on Jun 6, 2012: > On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 10:01:42 -0500, John Hein > wrote: > > > Does anyone know if there are any ports for which mesa's libGL is > > required or preferred over the nvidia flavor? > > Wouldn't this be more obvious already? I'd suspect some existing Nvidia > user would have reported a bug already about a program not working because > the current situation completely overwrites the mesa libGL, so it's nearly > the same situation. > > I've been running Nvidia for years and use all sorts of applications. So > far I haven't hit this yet, so presumably there are minimal compatibility > issues. Yes, I expected the number of failure cases to be small and/or not noticed. Have you tried a vnc server that links with libGL and successfully uses 3d acceleration (in a remote vnc viewer)?