From owner-freebsd-doc Sat May 18 6:10: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224EB37B404 for ; Sat, 18 May 2002 06:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4IDA3X71177; Sat, 18 May 2002 06:10:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 06:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205181310.g4IDA3X71177@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Giorgos Keramidas Subject: Re: docs/38240: In section 2.9.11 of the Handbook "X-server" should be "X server" Reply-To: Giorgos Keramidas Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR docs/38240; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Marc Fonvieille Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: docs/38240: In section 2.9.11 of the Handbook "X-server" should be "X server" Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 16:01:39 +0300 On 2002-05-18 13:32, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > In section 2.9.11 of the Handbook we can find many "X-server" or "X > server", only this latter should be used. Read the patch below for > more details. Hello Marc, Well spotted. You are right that one of the two (and not both) should be used. I'm more in favor of X server or X-server, since "X server" can be wrapper in many funny ways as shown below: After you install the X server, ... What do you think? - Giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message