From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Oct 24 17:44:35 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id RAA14124
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 24 Oct 1995 17:44:35 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA14109
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 1995 17:44:31 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id RAA07521; Tue, 24 Oct 1995 17:43:50 -0700
To: "Steven G. Kargl" <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
cc: erich@lodgenet.com (Eric L. Hernes), brian@MediaCity.com,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: linux emul is go! 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 24 Oct 1995 17:05:55 PDT."
             <199510250005.RAA17284@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> 
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 1995 17:43:50 -0700
Message-ID: <7519.814581830@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> What about the sources for the linux libraries that you distribute
> in binary form?  Will you make these available for the next 3(?) years?
> Will this violate the GPL?

You need to either make them available, be willing to make them
available or point to a location where they're freely available.
I believe that the GPL makes loose provisions for all 3.

Also, I hardly expect that this is going to cause undue friction
where that whole thing is concerned.

					Jordan