Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 07 Jan 2013 16:08:30 +0100
From:      John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st>
To:        "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc:        Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why delete KDE3 ports?
Message-ID:  <50EAE4EE.20609@marino.st>
In-Reply-To: <50EAE40E.5090300@aldan.algebra.com>
References:  <mailman.202.1357547625.2166.freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> <50EADA33.9010308@aldan.algebra.com> <50EADEFA.2070201@marino.st> <CA%2B7WWSeUb15S_8XRoSiQy4-4fZUVH%2B0Gg914abpJdwzFCp_QEg@mail.gmail.com> <50EAE40E.5090300@aldan.algebra.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/7/2013 16:04, Mikhail T. wrote:
> On 07.01.2013 09:54, Kimmo Paasiala wrote:
>> Are you willing to step up as the maintainer of the KDE3 ports? Or
>> anyone else reading this? The situation with ports like KDE3 is that
>> they are lots of work to keep up in shape and if no one wants to
>> maintain them they succumb to what is called "bitrot" very quickly
>> when something changes in dependent ports or in the base system.

> When/if that happens, we can renew the conversation. For the time being
> there are no build errors.

I agree with this.  Simple bitrot can be patched pretty quickly even w/o 
a maintainer and if nobody is willing to do that then sure, kill it.

FYI I already maintain a number of ports and I intend to add more Ada 
ports in the future, so I can't pick up KDE3 myself.

John



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50EAE4EE.20609>