From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  7 19:01:57 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4D9C4D
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2014 19:01:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.intertainservices.com (mail.intertainservices.com
 [69.77.177.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86F678A
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2014 19:01:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freebsd.local (unknown [172.16.10.114])
 by mail.intertainservices.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1332756A8F
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon,  7 Apr 2014 15:01:48 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <5342F61B.4030006@intertainservices.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:01:47 -0400
From: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: What's up with the swapping since 10/stable
References: <CA+D9QhvDsTwosUxUeL2U05dMt+Ke6kY5BYCNjJo8e8TsfZTsXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <A4BE503B-ADA9-4F61-893E-79A5F30728A2@bridgenet.se>
 <533DB9B1.3070500@denninger.net>
 <CA+D9Qhvr+ny80J1zSxPNC_bH1gtvJAOxkfmLXxuiFZsRVyXQ3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140405152855.1cfcf37c87bdff3306d0cd6c@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20140405152855.1cfcf37c87bdff3306d0cd6c@dec.sakura.ne.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-intertainservices-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
 information
X-intertainservices-MailScanner-ID: 1332756A8F.A40F2
X-intertainservices-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-intertainservices-MailScanner-From: mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 19:01:57 -0000

The thing is i don't use ZFS. One of my servers is running on 9-STABLE 
with ZFS and uses a fraction of the swap that my desktop does.

On 04/05/14 02:28, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
> Yes, Karl's patch fixed my swap regression, too.
> ZFS-root notebook with 8GB RAM, stable/10 amd64.
>
> No swap usage is observed after applying his patch, feeling (but not
> measured) no performance penalty.
>
> But unfortunately, the patch haven't been merged even to head.
> So, anyone chasing vanilla head or stable/10 has no fix yet.
>
>
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 09:24:52 +0200
> Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This was an old post and after few week Karl came up with an arc patch
>> which fixed this issue.
>