From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Sep 2 1:57:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFB914C19 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 01:57:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA15868; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 02:56:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id CAA23855; Thu, 2 Sep 1999 02:56:52 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199909020856.CAA23855@harmony.village.org> To: Mike Smith Subject: Re: Proposal: Add generic username for 3rd-party MTA's Cc: Ollivier Robert , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Sep 1999 15:56:10 PDT." <199909012256.PAA01514@dingo.cdrom.com> References: <199909012256.PAA01514@dingo.cdrom.com> Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 02:56:51 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199909012256.PAA01514@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes: : If we do this, I hope a more obvious name is chosen; something like : "mailman" might be a start. Or "mailperson", or "postperson", or : whatever. "mta" just feels a little obscure. postmanpete which is both obscure and descriptive. Sadly it may be sexist as well... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message