From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 19:06:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A5016A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:06:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70D4543D48 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:06:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@chello.cz) Received: (qmail 12022 invoked by uid 0); 21 Jun 2004 19:06:48 -0000 Received: from r3al16.mistral.cz (HELO isis.wad.cz) (213.220.229.16) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 21 Jun 2004 19:06:48 -0000 Received: by isis.wad.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B8A22FDA01; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:06:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:06:48 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040621190648.GA4459@isis.wad.cz> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Max Laier , Michael Reifenberger References: <20040620134437.P94503@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040620230350.O1720@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040621105114.G9108@fw.reifenberger.com> <200406211639.22243.max@love2party.net> <20040621164657.GA2544@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040621164657.GA2544@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Max Laier cc: Michael Reifenberger Subject: Re: startup error for pflogd X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 19:06:50 -0000 # obrien@freebsd.org / 2004-06-21 09:46:57 -0700: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:39:10PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > > This might seem like OpenBSD/paranoia, but my opinion on it is: It's done so > > why not port it over? It also helps to keep the diff down (which means less > > work). > > > > If there is no resistance against "yet another user", I will add _pflogd. > > I would prefer just 'pflogd' until it is discussed if we want to follow > the _ way. I'd prefer the underscored kind. I remember a post on ports@ from a guy called Cyrus complaining about the mail/cyrus* ports stealing his login. This kind of problems can be avoided, plus there's the benefit of easier recognition of "system" processes (daemons) from user ones in e. g. top(1). -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html