From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 10 20:55:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA14189 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:55:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp ([202.247.4.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA14169 for ; Thu, 10 Dec 1998 20:55:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp) Received: from nwsl.mesh.ad.jp (localhost.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp [127.0.0.1]) by chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA04025; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:52:18 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199812110452.NAA04025@chandra.eatell.msr.prug.or.jp> To: Warner Losh cc: jfesler@gigo.com, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PAO Integration? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 10 Dec 1998 19:20:24 MST." <199812110220.TAA65513@harmony.village.org> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 13:52:18 +0900 From: NAKAGAWA Yoshihisa Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Solaris 2.4 or 2.5 was the first to support soft power off, if I > recall correctly. In the timeline of unix, that can hardly be called > "traditional." :-) On SONY NEWS old WS, NEWS-OS 4.x support power-off by "shutdown -x". That OS is based on 4.3BSD. At least, "halt" and "power-off" is different mean on traditional UNIX. -- NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa y-nakaga@nwsl.mesh.ad.jp nakagawa@jp.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message