From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 00:15:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691471065673 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com) Received: from smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com (smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com [217.146.188.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBF078FC16 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com) Received: (qmail 10801 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2008 00:15:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=btinternet.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=TRQzjXkAq+go5dnw+6hkKalTEiOBaM/e61mQPwJwzmbhlsh/kUl2aEhT3fAcaX+KglHDKjyyFQtRVUHtpIpA71P1gjCfs1EjBZfy7mI7crZTwIw/aYrwt17EY9FpSl/7Y+J7oe0CpzDMuAlYuJnyITOTFipysx2NJBNOdv7eqFM= ; Received: from unknown (HELO w2fzz0vc03.aah-go-on.com) (Thomas.Sparrevohn@86.134.117.32 with login) by smtp809.mail.ird.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Nov 2008 00:15:54 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: PiYMOVQVM1lkYf940eZNgMwNDvkNjXgBqA9QQSZV7C3U5CDwHN3.I8fLpQzOakSH5Diy.KhZae1q0wLt26tfSJrUAz2Pskk8WxO5POXnA39mCqn9s1UZ9LsXLp5_f4Zci60- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Thomas Sparrevohn To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:15:53 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20081117205526.GC1733@garage.freebsd.pl> <200811182340.13372.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200811200015.54319.Thomas.Sparrevohn@btinternet.com> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New ZFS in the tree. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:15:56 -0000 On Wednesday 19 November 2008 10:14:02 Ivan Voras wrote: > Thomas Sparrevohn wrote: > > On Tuesday 18 November 2008 21:56:38 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 09:50:51PM +0000, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote: > >>> On Tuesday 18 November 2008 21:32:44 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > >>>> What's unexpected in that? As I noted it still needs more work, so > >>>> chflags(2) working properly would be unexpected for me:) > >>>> > >>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> LOL - Unexpected that it just not returns operation not supported as it used to - I was a bit > >>> trigger happy and upgraded my main pool - against the sound advice - leaves me in a bit of trouble ;-) > >> Try 'make installworld NO_FSCHG='. > >> > > > > LOL and now I feel really stupid - thanks > > Hmmm, I did an installworld from UFS to ZFS yesterday without special > flags (actually, multiple installworlds for benchmarking), without > errors. Files really did get schg (or equivalent) flag since I couldn't > rm them afterwards. How is this possible? :) > > > That is a surprise - as mine failed - totally - had to manually restore libc