From owner-freebsd-multimedia Thu Jul 29 4:34:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mail-out.visi.com (tele.visi.com [209.98.98.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F6A14DDE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 04:34:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mestery@visi.com) Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by mail-out.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F321F85E for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 06:34:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (mestery@localhost) by isis.visi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA29612 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 1999 06:34:06 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: isis.visi.com: mestery owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 06:34:06 -0500 (CDT) From: To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Gogo vs. Bladeenc, Part II Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well, I tried the latest Gogo vs. the latest Bladeenc from our ports tree, and here are more results: GOGO: 249.15 real 239.20 user 2.15 sys File size: 3446902 BLADEENC: 540.42 real 527.44 user 5.02 sys File size: 3446907 (FYI, this was encoding a song that was 3:34 seconds long a dual PPro machine with 128MB RAM.) I'm getting about 1.17:1 compression times with Gogo, which is amazing to me since I previously used bladeenc, which gave me 2-3:1 times. And there is no difference in the output quality. Gogo works nice, give it a try. -- Kyle Mestery | StorageTek's Storage Networking Group mestery@visi.com | http://www.freebsd.org/ mestery@netwinder.org | http://www.netwinder.org/ Protect your right to privacy: www.freecrypto.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-multimedia" in the body of the message