From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 22 5:43:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from merlin.onsea.com (p66s09a03.client.global.net.uk [195.147.169.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B05C15101 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 05:43:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dozprompt@onsea.com) Received: from localhost (dozprompt@localhost) by merlin.onsea.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA00463; Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:43:38 GMT (envelope-from dozprompt@onsea.com) X-Authentication-Warning: merlin.onsea.com: dozprompt owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:43:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Cliff Rowley To: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr Cc: Tim Tsai , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DOS? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Beware of getting a TCP/IP stack working in your "doscmd" window (BTW, I've only seen it running under Xfree86). > > I had thought of transfering a "development environment" running here under DOS, but I stopped when I saw I had to use a networking stack from under DOS (I still don't know if it is at all possible to "rsh " from the DOS window to the underlying FreeBSD). That's ok, I dont actually need a TCP/IP stack under the emulation. The reason being that our hardware lies in stealth, and just listens. The reason I need FreeBSD and DOS together is so that I can generate traffic between my 2 machines when testing the board. If I were to run the board under just DOS, I would have no way of generating traffic. I'm going mad! :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message