From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Jul 27 17:57:10 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id RAA16972
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 17:57:10 -0700
Received: from pongo.cs.wisc.edu (pongo.cs.wisc.edu [128.105.63.22])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA16966
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 17:57:08 -0700
Received: (from jcargill@localhost) by pongo.cs.wisc.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id TAA08564; Thu, 27 Jul 1995 19:57:01 -0500
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 1995 19:57:01 -0500
Message-Id: <199507280057.TAA08564@pongo.cs.wisc.edu>
From: Jonathan Cargille <jcargill@cs.wisc.edu>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: New 2.1.0-950726-SNAP available - come 'n get it!
In-Reply-To: <2997.806887891@time.cdrom.com>
References: <2997.806887891@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk


Jordan K. Hubbard writes:

   Now available on freefall and ftp.freebsd.org:	2.1.0-950726-SNAP
   
   This supercedes the previous snap, 2.0.5-950622-SNAP.

This SNAP naming seems to be getting a bit inconsistent; if
2.0.5-950622-SNAP was a "post-2.0.5" snapshot, shouldn't
2.1.0-950726-SNAP be a "post-2.1" snapshot?

Or is it just me?   ;-)   Or did I sleep through the 2.1 release?  ;-)

Jon

p.s.  The upgrade-in-place stuff sounds awesome...

p.p.s. Yes, I know that consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.