From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 02:27:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA01616A4CE for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 02:27:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163E243D46 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 02:27:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (blackwater.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AE82BD73 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 21:27:12 +1100 (EST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id EBC6C51209; Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:57:09 +1030 (CST) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 20:57:09 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20040125102709.GA50402@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20040124231857.GM20359@wantadilla.lemis.com> <50679.1075020696@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040124013406.GB20359@wantadilla.lemis.com> <31415.1074930283@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040124231857.GM20359@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6TrnltStXW4iwmi0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50679.1075020696@critter.freebsd.dk> <20040124231857.GM20359@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org cc: Lukas Ertl Subject: Re: Updated geom_vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2004 10:27:17 -0000 --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 25 January 2004 at 9:51:36 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20040124231857.GM20359@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" > writes: >> >> --4oF+6Ged69J0+4/e >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> Content-Disposition: inline >> >> On Saturday, 24 January 2004 at 8:44:43 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>> In message <20040124013406.GB20359@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" >>> writes: >>> >>>> While a lot of things go away as the result of GEOM, others don't, >>>> like the I/O stats and revive parameters for example. >>> >>> Geom takes care of the I/O stats, see gstat(8) >> >> It only does a subset of the Vinum stats. > > What is missing ? As I said: > It only does a subset of the Vinum stats. It's also unclear how it > can handle important Vinum-specific things like the number of > fragmented requests. There are other things too, but in view of this issue, I don't think it's worth discussing the relative merits of the other stats. It would be more interesting to consider a distributed manner of keeping stats. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAE5n9IubykFB6QiMRAoAUAKCcEyiVnGXbc6SB0Cde+YWwk1IIMACcCneW ldvu3dJrjqiiWZrDCMC2+gk= =TqOm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0--