From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 8 20:22:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id UAA24954 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 20:22:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id UAA24945 for ; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 20:22:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.2/8.6.12) with SMTP id UAA08266; Wed, 8 Jan 1997 20:22:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Jan 1997 20:22:11 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White X-Sender: dwhite@localhost Reply-To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu To: Meir Dukhan cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pseudo-device bpfilter and Ethernet card In-Reply-To: <32D3E29B.59E2B600@bis.co.il> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 8 Jan 1997, Meir Dukhan wrote: > Hy, > > > >From the freebsd handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/handbook44.html#52 > > > pseudo-device bpfilter number > > Berkeley packet filter. This pseudo-device allows network > > interfaces to be placed in promiscuous mode, > [snip] > ... > > Not all network cards support this capability. > > Is one experienced an ethernet card that doesn't support the bpfilter > pseudo-device (and then tcpdump will be useless) ? The EtherExpress 16's don't support it, at least in 2.1 (last time I had an ix in a machine). Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major