From owner-freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org Fri Jun 28 23:01:30 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gecko@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E8715CE776 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2DB8CB1E for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F1BD915CE775; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:01:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: gecko@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E015215CE773 for ; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mouf.net (mouf.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:4400:216:3eff:fe69:33b3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mouf.net", Issuer "mouf.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86AC28CB17; Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lrrr.mouf.net (cpe-174-109-174-192.nc.res.rr.com [174.109.174.192]) (authenticated bits=0) by mouf.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id x5SN1LTR076868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:01:26 GMT (envelope-from swills@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Firefox and GTK2 To: Jan Beich Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org References: <7536c5cf-f8a0-fe5c-661f-b7909b9d57aa@FreeBSD.org> <491275b9-47ef-58b4-ab0c-bdaf1bed13b4@FreeBSD.org> <5d74ebf9-49cd-04bc-d6b5-aa156491f29f@FreeBSD.org> From: Steve Wills Message-ID: Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 19:01:16 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mouf.net [199.48.129.64]); Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:01:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=4.5 tests=none autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mouf.net X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mouf.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 86AC28CB17 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.92 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.922,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 23:01:30 -0000 Hi, On 6/28/19 5:56 PM, Jan Beich wrote: > Steve Wills writes: > [snip] > > How does libcanberra decide which gtk to use? > Wouldn't that be based on how it's built and what it's linked against? [snip] > > That's the point. I couldn't find where libcanberra depends on gtk3. > It's probably Gtk that calls into libcanberra. If so then every gtk30 > consumer that depends on libcanberra also needs libcanberra-gtk3. > > $ strings /usr/local/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so | fgrep libcanberra > libcanberra.so.0 > libcanberra-gtk.so.0 > libcanberra-gtk-module.so > > $ strings /usr/local/lib/gtk-3.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so | fgrep libcanberra > libcanberra.so.0 > libcanberra-gtk3.so.0 > libcanberra-gtk3-module.so > Sorry, what are you looking for here? What would be different that you're not seeing? >>> GTK3 is still optional in www/seamonkey and not supported in www/palemoon. >> >> Maybe the libcanberra dep could be moved out of bsd.gecko.mk and into >> the ports? > > Right. To Mk/Uses/gnome.mk where USE_GNOME=canberra can decide whether > to pull -gtk3 slave or not. USE_GNOME=canberra might make sense, yeah, although I'm not sure how it would decide which to use. Maybe that would have to specified. Steve