From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun  9 19:32:26 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BFA16A41C
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 19:32:26 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B50843D53
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 19:32:25 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2])
	by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j59JWIVa002013;
	Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:32:18 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10])
	by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024) with LMTP
	id 14869-11; Thu,  9 Jun 2005 22:32:17 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213])
	by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j59JWHOt002010
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:32:17 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
	by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.3/8.13.3) id j59JWYct056735;
	Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:32:34 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru)
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:32:34 +0300
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-ID: <20050609193234.GF32656@ip.net.ua>
References: <864qc9mgqc.fsf@xps.des.no> <42A73773.1040508@elischer.org>
	<20050610025325.J22796@delplex.bde.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DO5DiztRLs659m5i"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050610025325.J22796@delplex.bde.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua
Cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>,
	arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Retiring static libpam support
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:32:26 -0000


--DO5DiztRLs659m5i
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:55:33AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> I think dlopen() still doesn't work right with static linkage.  I don't
> miss any dynamically loaded PAM modules since I don't need them.
>=20
Ah, I keep forgetting this.  If this is the case, I withdraw my
"yes" vote.

P.S.  Thanks for the compliments.  :-)

What version of FreeBSD are you running now?


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--DO5DiztRLs659m5i
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCqJlSqRfpzJluFF4RAt9DAJwOcXc8mS1mD4R1M8wdDtEsyn4XaACgnx7o
mRg8etu49+l8hzYJBKbmWbA=
=NufQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DO5DiztRLs659m5i--