Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 23:24:45 +0100 From: Eric Masson <e-masson@kisoft-services.com> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.1->5.2 Message-ID: <86oet497f6.fsf@t39bsdems.interne.kisoft-services.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040115170208.74950B-100000@fledge.watson.org> (Robert Watson's message of "Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:04:59 -0500 (EST)") References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040115170208.74950B-100000@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> writes: Hello, Robert> Moving to PFIL_HOOKS for all the "funky IP input/ouput" Will all available packet filters, including ipfw rely on PFIL_HOOKS or not ? Regards Eric Masson -- C'est pas avec la censure que tu vas censurer les censeurs. -+- JL in GNU : Las, censeurs pour l'échafaud -+-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86oet497f6.fsf>