From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jan 20 11:28:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from post.kis.ru (post.kis.ru [195.98.32.206]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D01737B416 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:28:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from xkis.kis.ru ([195.98.32.200] verified) by post.kis.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.2) with SMTP id 267245; Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:28:13 +0300 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 22:28:13 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Valdov X-Sender: dv@xkis.kis.ru To: Bill Moran Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATA driver feature request In-Reply-To: <3C4B17E4.1080702@potentialtech.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 20 Jan 2002, Bill Moran wrote: > Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 14:17:56 -0500 > From: Bill Moran > To: Dmitry Valdov > Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: ATA driver feature request > > Dmitry Valdov wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is it possible to do not disable UDMA-100 when there is UDMA-33 device at > > the some IDE cable? > > w2k works fine with this hardware configuration with ATA-100. > > Are you sure it's actually running the drive at ata-100? It was an Intel driver diagnostic for Intel chipset. It says that one of drives running at ATA-100 and other at ATA-33. How I can test it another way? > > > FreeBSD limits both > > drives on the bus because there is 'non-ATA66 compliant cable'. > ^^^^^ > > Are you sure you have an 80 conductor cable and that it isn't too long? > Yes. When I disconnect secondary (non ATA-66/100 compliant) drive from this cable, FreeBSD use ATA-100 on primary. Dmitry. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message