From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 26 20:59:26 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B051B1F8;
 Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:59:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com
 [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754581C8A;
 Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:59:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::acbc:c165:3b28:a78a] (unknown
 [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:acbc:c165:3b28:a78a])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 554675C43;
 Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:59:23 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
Subject: Re: Global destructor order problems (was: Re: Are ports supposed to
 build and run on 10-CURRENT?)
From: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130626204521.GU91021@kib.kiev.ua>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:59:24 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <6900C006-2A57-4EAF-B19A-629A85CBA001@FreeBSD.org>
References: <20130613031535.4087d7f9@bsd64.grem.de>
 <EF830CD7-00F1-4628-8515-76133BBE85E7@FreeBSD.org>
 <C1CC40FC-4489-4164-96B7-5E1A25DCB37F@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130626015508.426ab5b9@bsd64.grem.de> <51CAADB8.7090603@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130626133149.4835f14a@bsd64.grem.de>
 <7CD9075C-F8D6-41C1-8D21-8B10DF866ECE@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130626204521.GU91021@kib.kiev.ua>
To: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org>, Brooks Davis <brooks@FreeBSD.org>,
 David Chisnall <theraven@freebsd.org>,
 "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Ports" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>,
 Michael Gmelin <freebsd@grem.de>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:59:26 -0000

On Jun 26, 2013, at 22:45, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:26:09PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> This revision is not in 9.1-RELEASE, but it is in 9-STABLE, so the
>> problem can also be reproduced there.
> ...
>> This is roughly gcc 4.3.0 and later.  For example, gcc 4.8 generates:
> I just tested the thing with gcc 4.8 on up to date stable/9 and HEAD.
> In both cases, major tom did not fail, at least not in the peculiar way.
> The gcc-generated code passed the PLT address of the corresponding
> destructor.

That is strange, did you compile the main program with -fPIC?  That is
the problem case.  If you don't compile the main program with -fPIC, the
problem will indeed not occur.

-Dimitry