From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 30 14:51:47 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 69CA316A4CE; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:51:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (64-169-229-100.ded.pacbell.net
	[64.169.229.100])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3AF8F43F93; Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:51:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com)
Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by beastie.mckusick.com (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h9UMbGeN022403;
	Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:37:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com)
Message-Id: <200310302237.h9UMbGeN022403@beastie.mckusick.com>
To: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 30 Oct 2003 12:28:10 PST."
             <3FA1745A.2090205@vicor.com> 
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 14:37:16 -0800
From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com>
cc: Ken Marx <kmarx@vicor.com>
cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org
cc: gluk@ptci.ru
cc: julian@elischer.org
Subject: Re: 4.8 ffs_dirpref problem 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 22:51:47 -0000

Don, your change appears to be quite helpful and is performance
neutral on my benchmarks. So, I suggest that you check them into
-current. They are also small enough that they would be a good
candidate to MFC to -stable.

	Kirk McKusick