From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 24 02:58:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B8F1065676 for ; Sat, 24 May 2008 02:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net (eastrmmtao104.cox.net [68.230.240.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B828FC1E for ; Sat, 24 May 2008 02:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo03.cox.net ([68.1.16.126]) by eastrmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080524025805.UXFL7964.eastrmmtao104.cox.net@eastrmimpo03.cox.net>; Fri, 23 May 2008 22:58:05 -0400 Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([24.255.149.218]) by eastrmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id VEy51Z0024iy4EG02Ey51x; Fri, 23 May 2008 22:58:05 -0400 To: "Gerald Pfeifer" From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 22:00:27 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.27 (Linux) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to handle RCs in terms of PORTVERSION and friends? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 02:58:07 -0000 On Fri, 23 May 2008 17:03:45 -0500, Gerald Pfeifer = = wrote: > Right now I find myself in the situation that Wine went into RC mode > and the current snapshots are of the form 1.0-rc1, 1.0-rc2 etc. Per > the Porters Handbook this means I have prepared an update with > > PORTVERSION=3D 1.0r1 Try DISTVERSION yet? Cheers, Mezz > This works just fine and is higher than the previous releases of the > form 0.9.61. > > However, what is going to happen with version 1.0 a bit later? > > % pkg_version -t 0.9.61 1.0r1 > < > % pkg_version -t 1.0r1 1.0 > > > > How can I best address this? I'm sure I am not the first ports > maintainer running into an issue like this, and bumping EPOCH does > not look like the desirable solution here. > > Gerald @FreeBSD.org -- = mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org