From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov 20 11:27:20 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672E216A417;
	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:27:20 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lol@chistydom.ru)
Received: from hermes.hw.ru (hermes.hw.ru [80.68.240.91])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391F613C459;
	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:27:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lol@chistydom.ru)
Received: from [80.68.244.40] (account a_popov@rbc.ru [80.68.244.40] verified)
	by hermes.hw.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.13)
	with ESMTPA id 201504203; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:26:43 +0300
Message-ID: <4742C46A.1060701@chistydom.ru>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:26:34 +0300
From: Alexey Popov <lol@chistydom.ru>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070924)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
References: <4741905E.8050300@chistydom.ru>	<fhs3s5$knj$1@ger.gmane.org>	<47419AB3.5030008@chistydom.ru>	<fhs7hp$2es$2@ger.gmane.org>
	<4741A7DA.2050706@chistydom.ru> <4741DA15.9000308@FreeBSD.org>
	<47429DB8.7040504@chistydom.ru> <4742ADFE.40902@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4742ADFE.40902@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: 2 x quad-core system is slower that 2 x dual core on FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:27:20 -0000

Hi

Kris Kennaway wrote:
>>>>>> CPU states:  9.5% user,  0.0% nice, 82.0% system,  0.5% 
>>>>>> interrupt,  8.0% idle
>>>>> A wild idea that might not help: try reducing kern.hz in 
>>>>> loader.conf to
>>>>> something like 100 and see if something significant changes.
>> Usually on PHP backends slow PHP code eats most of the CPU time. I 
>> have %user much bigger than %system in CPU states.
>> But now %system is much bigger than %user and I can conclude that on 
>> 8-core server FreeBSD consumes more CPU time than PHP.
> That is one possibility, but you still need to look at the actual 
> throughput on these machines before making conclusions about which is 
> performing better.  Can you please provide those numbers for 6.x, 7.x 
> with ULE and 4BSD on the 4-core and 8-core systems?
Ok, here's results of practical research. The following is approximate 
maximum qps that backends can survive with my workload:

7-STABLE quad ULE	20
7-STABLE quad 4BSD	17
6-STABLE quad		14
6-STABLE dual		21
Linux CentOS 5 quad	>50

With best regards,
Alexey Popov