Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 11:06:30 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: common filesystem for Linux and FreeBSD Message-ID: <fk863c$to3$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <20071218050403.GA41080@demeter.hydra> References: <20071217063559.GB33846@demeter.hydra> <fk5g4r$682$1@ger.gmane.org> <20071218050403.GA41080@demeter.hydra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig110D32156964A502DBF4D429 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chad Perrin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 10:39:31AM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >> Chad Perrin wrote: >> >>> That being the case, there is some data I would like to keep availabl= e to >>> both FreeBSD and Linux systems, in stable read/write access with >>> reasonably high access performance for both (fast enough to achieve >>> decent frame rates, for instance). This seems to rule out both ext3 = and >>> UFS2. What filesystem(s) meet(s) my needs in this case? >> Since you didn't state anything about reliability, ext2 will maybe hel= p >> you :) >=20 > I thought "stable" covered that. ext2fs is "stable" in the sense that there are no known bugs, and it's 100% compatible with Linux. It "just works". Unless you get frequent power outages or similar "hard" errors, the lack of journaling shouldn't bother you much. --------------enig110D32156964A502DBF4D429 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4-svn0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHZ5usldnAQVacBcgRAmQhAJ9oyGl9ACdJ0u8CZtgQ11KlTMXlAwCg5l+N UUobE70D7J4bDZjFsKVmAlk= =Q4lC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig110D32156964A502DBF4D429--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?fk863c$to3$1>