From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 14 23:35:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A5E16A4CE for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:35:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9452643D55 for ; Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:35:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ben@spooty.net) Received: from m44-mp1.cvx3-b.pop.dial.ntli.net ([80.1.84.44]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040614233538.GUKI5696.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@m44-mp1.cvx3-b.pop.dial.ntli.net> for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 00:35:38 +0100 From: Ben Paley To: "freebsd -questions@" Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 22:45:17 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406142245.17977.ben@spooty.net> Subject: pkgdb and ruby X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 23:35:52 -0000 Hello Contientiously, I like to run pkgdb -F fairly often, especially if I'm using portinstall or portupgrade a lot. Recently I've been getting this: su-2.05b# pkgdb -F ---> Checking the package registry database Duplicated origin: databases/ruby-bdb1 - ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 Unregister any of them? [no] su-2.05b# pkg_info | grep ruby ruby-1.6.8.2003.10.15 An object-oriented interpreted scripting language ruby-1.8.1_2 An object-oriented interpreted scripting language ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 Ruby interface to Berkeley DB revision 1.8x with full ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3 A set of Ruby modules to provide Ruby 1.8 ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 Ruby interface to Berkeley DB revision 1.8x with full Am I safe to remove ruby-1.6.8.2003.10.15 and ruby-bdb1-0.2.1, and point everything at ruby-1.8.1_2 and ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2 respectively? And if so, do I still need ruby-shim? Cheers, Ben