From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 09:47:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC1116A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:47:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from newman.gte.com (newman.gte.com [132.197.8.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0908D43FDF for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:47:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ak03@gte.com) Received: from h132-197-179-27.gte.com (kanpc.gte.com [132.197.179.27]) by newman.gte.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA21063 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:47:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from kanpc.gte.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])hAKHlNrY077196 for ; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:47:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ak03@gte.com) Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:47:23 -0500 From: Alexander Kabaev Message-Id: <20031120124723.062e4fb0.ak03@gte.com> In-Reply-To: <20031120173515.GB28666@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: <200311201822.48804.avleeuwen@piwebs.com> <7677F9D9-1B7E-11D8-856F-000502C708CB@sitetronics.com> <20031120173515.GB28666@pasternak.w.lub.pl> Organization: Verizon Data Services X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws71 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCO goes after BSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:47:26 -0000 On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 18:35:15 +0100 Michal Pasternak wrote: > Devon H. O'Dell [Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 06:24:57PM +0100]: > > What does this have to do with the advocacy of FreeBSD? > > Well, we are unable now to advocate FreeBSD via saying: > "SCO is after Linux, so please use BSD" > ;) > Where on earth did you people find any proof to rumors of SCO going after _any_ of FreeBSD, NetBSD and OpenBSD projects? All there is in the news is claim that code removed from BSD's as a part of settlement did find their way back to Linux with copyright notices stripped. So, what does this have to do with the advocacy of FreeBSD again? -- Alexander Kabaev