From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 22 17:25:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27CD16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:25:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6EC43D1D for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:25:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48671FF9A7; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:25:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 942BA1FF931; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:25:05 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 2D7CC15743; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E0F1538C; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:20:45 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Palle Girgensohn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: devel/icu and devel/icu2 should CONFLICT? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:25:11 -0000 On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Palle Girgensohn wrote: Hi, > I'm pretty certain that devel/icu and devel/icu2 should conflict. Their > plists are very similar. Any reason not to add CONFLICT to them? gtk-gnutella-0.95 should switch to icu (if not already happened) and icu2 should be deleted? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT