From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 23 21:25:33 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9BC816A4CE
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9755C43D1D
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:25:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kaarthik@comcast.net)
Received: from the-saint.the-saint.localdomain
	(pcp06945825pcs.nrockv01.md.comcast.net[69.138.30.56])
	by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP
	id <20040324052532012008bcmhe>; Wed, 24 Mar 2004 05:25:32 +0000
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
From: Kaarthik Sivakumar <kaarthik@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <200403231920.i2NJK4Bx004045@peedub.jennejohn.org> (Gary
 Jennejohn's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2004 20:20:04 +0100")
References: <200403231920.i2NJK4Bx004045@peedub.jennejohn.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:26:35 -0500
Message-ID: <86oeqmq0hg.fsf@comcast.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.5 (celeriac, berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: xemacs-devel port
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 05:25:34 -0000

>>> "GJ" == Gary Jennejohn <garyj@jennejohn.org> writes:
GJ> Wouldn't hurt since I, the maintainer, can't get into freefall to
GJ> do any commits.

Ok, I will file a pr.

GJ> This is really a nit! xemacs has bigger problems, but what the
GJ> heck.

I know, but a user did mention on the xemacs-beta mailing list that
21.5 is gamma and that raised concerns there about our packaging. So..

What bigger problems do you see with xemacs? I run
compiled-from-source xemacs 21.5.x and other than standard beta
software problems with xemacs in general (ie not FreeBSD specific),
everything seems ok. I use compiled-from-source 21.4 at work and that
is quite good.

kaarthik