Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Apr 1997 05:12:35 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com>
To:        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith)
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Continual Education (was Re: A Desparate Plea)
Message-ID:  <199704300912.FAA21778@hda.hda.com>
In-Reply-To: <199704300600.PAA26367@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from Michael Smith at "Apr 30, 97 03:30:10 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> A relevant question.  Most LKMs are loaded once and never unloaded;
> these aren't a problem source.  The LKM framework was a bit of a
> kludge at the time, and has perhaps not been brought completely up to
> snuff simply because it worked "well enough".

I use LKMs in kernel development - the posix4 work I've been doing
has been all via LKMs and I load and unload probably 100 times between
reboots.

-- 
Peter Dufault (dufault@hda.com)   Realtime Machine Control and Simulation
HD Associates, Inc.               Voice: 508 433 6936



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704300912.FAA21778>