Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:26:50 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de> Cc: je killen <jekillen@prodigy.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MySQL version for 6.0 Message-ID: <20060206235650.GC855@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <43E7218F.5070705@cs.tu-berlin.de> References: <b16cedcbfed0f13e3ab9101bf3a996c7@prodigy.net> <43E6675D.5080903@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20060205230625.GB855@wantadilla.lemis.com> <43E7218F.5070705@cs.tu-berlin.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--hIhQBbMWEy++B+zM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Monday, 6 February 2006 at 11:14:39 +0100, Bjrn Knig wrote: > Greg 'groggy' Lehey schrieb: > >> I'd be interested to know why you recommend version 4.1 over 5.0. > > I still had not enough time to investigate 5.0. I just ran sql-bench a > few times on a dual Pentium III 733 machine and noticed that 5.0 was up > to 10% slower than 4.1 with the default configuration. So my > recommendation is neither binding nor reasonable; it's just a random > proposal according to my feeling. :-) If people do have issues with MySQL performance, let me remind you of the mailing lists at http://forums.mysql.com/. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --hIhQBbMWEy++B+zM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFD5+JCIubykFB6QiMRAixGAJ46Hcjk6l+mMmAbU6ew8YtTlThb5gCdGJq9 3rv2v84qiS9YfHSvM7rNnFk= =xNPx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hIhQBbMWEy++B+zM--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060206235650.GC855>