Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 08 Mar 2016 11:00:12 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        ruby@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 207799] [new port] textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline1: clone of textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline just in version 1
Message-ID:  <bug-207799-21402@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D207799

            Bug ID: 207799
           Summary: [new port] textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline1: clone of
                    textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline just in version 1
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Only Me
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: ruby@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: ports@toco-domains.de
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(ruby@FreeBSD.org)
          Assignee: ruby@FreeBSD.org

Created attachment 167842
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D167842&action=
=3Dedit
shar with new port textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline1

Hello,

attached a new port textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline1. We already have a port
textproc/rubygem-html-pipeline, which currently contains version 2.x. Sadly
version 1.x and 2.x are not compatible and the new port www/gitlab currently
needs 1.x.

Therefore i've created this new port. Is should just last as long as GitLab
needs the old version and will be removed after that.

poudriere build fine for:
9.3 amd + i386
10.1 amd + i386
10.2 amd + i386
11-current r293820 amd + i386

portlint is also fine.

And i did a runtime test to verify that the port is loadable and usable!

Greetings,
Torsten

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-207799-21402>