Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 08:41:08 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? Message-ID: <4362.886232468@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 30 Jan 1998 20:08:32 EST." <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman write s: ><<On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:04:04 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet. >com> said: > >> Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's >> bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and >> X.25 code have all been fixed... > >But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to >real users. ... But appearantly not enough added value to make anybody actually make it work. QED: The attic is the right place. And yes, personally I belive that portals & unionfs could go the same way... -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." "Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4362.886232468>