Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 09:33:22 -0700 From: jd1008 <jd1008@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why would I get a segmentation fault on one system but not the other? Message-ID: <54EA04D2.6090208@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150222104425.GA44573@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150221224006.GA5501@home.parts-unknown.org> <09da5ec0816e098badc49432c802dc18@sdf.org> <390c4c0547fc27e91d28872d29aa2e04@sdf.org> <20150222091956.fd1ec914.freebsd@edvax.de> <20150222104425.GA44573@home.parts-unknown.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02/22/2015 03:44 AM, David Benfell wrote: > On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 09:19:56AM +0100, Polytropon wrote: >> On Sat, 21 Feb 2015 17:03:50 -0600, cpet wrote: >>> As well as don't use stable on a production box as STABLE doesn't mean >>> what it means. >> STABLE means that the API/ABI is stable. Unlike HEAD (CURRENT), >> STABLE still is actually _stable_ in most cases, so it's a valid >> solution for production systems (given that you're prepared well, >> and you know what you're doing). I'm running STABLE on few >> production machines myself (where this is needed), but I usually >> prefer (and often recommend) using RELEASE and add the security >> patches when they are available. >> > Thinking about this more, I'm inclined to think my problem is not with > the base system. I haven't seen *any* crashes with stuff that can be > clearly identified as being in the base system, let alone the kernel. > > My memory test has just completed a 4th pass with zero errors. It's > now been running for 7.5 hours. > > I think my problem is somewhere in the ports. > A crazy possibility - but thought I would mention it. Is it possible you are having overheating problems, fans not running well?...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?54EA04D2.6090208>