From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 5 15:00:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE11B106566B for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5888FC13 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JWv6l-0002Ed-Bl for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:00:39 +0000 Received: from 195.208.174.178 ([195.208.174.178]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:00:39 +0000 Received: from vadim_nuclight by 195.208.174.178 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:00:39 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Vadim Goncharov Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 15:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Nuclear Lightning @ Tomsk, TPU AVTF Hostel Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: <20080305083930.Q37745@shell.xecu.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.208.174.178 X-Comment-To: Andy Dills User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Subject: Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vadim_nuclight@mail.ru List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:00:45 -0000 Hi Andy Dills! On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 08:40:20 -0500 (EST); Andy Dills wrote about 'Re: INET6 required for SCTP in 7.0?': >> O.K., have snipped all the above IPv4 stuff, which actually seems quite >> reaosnable (though appears to foorget about STF), but this line... >> >>> In the meantime, I'd like to only enable IPv6 on IPv6 enabled networks. >> >> ...I fail to see how not wanting to enable it leads to you wanting >> to remove it from the kernel entirely ? That is the bit I don't understand >> about all of this discussion. Theres probably hundereds of bits in the kernel >> you havent enabled and don't use, why specificly do you want an option >> to take IPV6 out ? >> >> I am genuinely piuzzled - why isn't "ipv6_enabled="NO" sufficient ? That's >> what I do on IPv4 networks and it works fine for me. > That's actually a good point. I've had a hard time shedding my "trim > everything I don't use out of the kernel" mentality over the years. Makes it harder to debug, etc. Don't want to see anything IPv6 related in command output, to let programs to bind on IPv6 addresses, etc. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight]