From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 14 00:29:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1CF16A4DF for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:29:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [65.122.236.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82A043D4C for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:29:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from Anne (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [65.122.236.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA15662; Sun, 13 Aug 2006 18:28:23 -0600 (MDT) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20060813182130.06f54060@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0 Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 18:23:33 -0600 To: Archie Cobbs , Julian Elischer From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <44DF51C1.8000306@dellroad.org> References: <7.0.1.0.2.20060810201735.067258b0@lariat.net> <44DBF2BB.5080202@micom.mng.net> <7.0.1.0.2.20060810212047.073f0078@lariat.net> <44DBFC05.6080804@elischer.org> <7.0.1.0.2.20060810220804.08de8568@lariat.net> <44DCB4D8.4020901@elischer.org> <44DF51C1.8000306@dellroad.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Ganbold , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Big PPTP server X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:29:22 -0000 At 10:22 AM 8/13/2006, Archie Cobbs wrote: >>That's more a question for archie as he wrote it, bit it was written to >>be a server on small appliance. >>Some people have been working on imporving mpd but I don't know >>much about it. > >It was not originally intended as a large scale server. It could be >adapted to that fairly easily but no one has done so yet. I might be motivated to try; however, I would need to understand more about its architecture (and about Netgraph, whose mysteries I haven't plumbed). Also, I understand that at least some of the code is from a very old implementation of PPP that was written in Japan many years ago. Have you thought about how such modifications might be made? --Brett Glass