From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Apr 4 11:31:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ptialaska.net (mail.ptialaska.net [198.70.245.245]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11C937B6C2; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 11:31:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vizion@ptialaska.net) Received: from vizion2000 (dialups-20.sitka.ptialaska.net [198.70.227.20]) by ptialaska.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA17374; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:31:36 -0800 (AKDT) Message-ID: <003201bf9e63$e37f87c0$14e346c6@demon.co.uk> From: "Southwell" To: "Kris Kennaway" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Attachments request Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 10:09:23 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Disposition-Notification-To: "Southwell" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just wanted to say thanks to all those who pointed out the inconsistenecy of asking all you guys to refrain from using attachments whilst sending out emails in HTML with a Gif attached......my only excuse is that I have moved half way over the world and do not yet have a bsd system up and running :-) - waiting for the new 4.00 CDs to arrive .. any day now I hope. I really appreciated the light hearted and friendly emails sent to my own email address.. thanks guys. > Kris Kennaway wrote --.> Attachments are often useful for distributing files (patches, program > logs) with email. I agree with you Kris and I feel I should have pointed that out with my original request. My main objection surrounds those who do not put the substanstance of their message in the main email but provide you with a subject line - no introduction and you therefore get blind attachments.. Such postings exhibit, IMHO, discourtesy and I would rather people refrained from that practice. Certainly attachments are very appropriate for the sort of things you mention. > I understand that for whatever reason some people can't use FreeBSD to > read their email, but this _is_ a FreeBSD list and I don't think we should > worry too much about catering to other platforms. This is another point which you could regard as being subsidiary to the main issue. I am not certain that I would agree with you here for three reasons. The first is a general one, and one that you might regard as irrelevant but I do not. I feel we need not disregard anyone's legitimate concerns. I also feel a need to be very welcoming to people who may (for example) be subscribing to the list as part of a learning exercise prior to installing freebsd. They are going to be very put off if they find people behaving in a manner they find to be either intolerant or inconsiderate. The second reason is that such an approach is somewhat inconsistent with the proclaimed notion that it is sensible to track this list prior to installing freebsd.By definition that would be done from some other platform. Thirdly freebsd users might want to track the list using some other OS if their system is down and they can`t fix it. They may want to use "some other lousy OS" or mailer to ask for help. And that poor unfortunate sould could be any one of us some day. So my plea is - can we, on those grounds at least, err on the side of being inclusive in our thinking rather than exclusive. David In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate or emails without attachments (unless needed as described above) :-) !! :-) (perhaps!) with apologies to -- Charles Forsythe and giving full credit to Kris David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message